How Drizzle Cube Compares
Picking an embedded analytics solution feels a bit like choosing a coffee order. There are many options, each with trade-offs, and what works for your neighbor might not suit you.
This page offers a factual comparison with popular alternatives. No shade thrown, just honest differences to help you decide.
At a Glance
Section titled “At a Glance”| Platform | Type | Embedding | Semantic Layer | Open Source | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drizzle Cube | Library | Native React | TypeScript + Drizzle ORM | Yes | Developers who love type safety |
| Metabase | BI Platform | iFrame/SDK | Limited | Yes (OSS) | Teams wanting visual query builder |
| Redash | SQL Tool | iFrame | None | Yes | SQL-savvy analysts |
| Apache Superset | BI Platform | iFrame | SQL transforms | Yes | SQL power users, many viz types |
| Embeddable | Dev Toolkit | React components | Cube.js | No | Commercial no-code embedding |
| Luzmo | SaaS Platform | SDK/iFrame | Built-in | No | Enterprise SaaS dashboards |
| Cube.dev | Semantic Layer | API/Playground | YAML/JS | Core (OSS) | Large-scale enterprise analytics |
| Mitzu | Product Analytics | Dashboard | None | No | Warehouse-native funnel analysis |
| Recharts DIY | Chart Library | Native React | None | Yes | Full custom control |
vs Metabase
Section titled “vs Metabase”Metabase is an open-source BI platform used by over 90,000 companies. It offers a visual query builder and can be deployed via JAR file, Docker, or their cloud service.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Data Modeling | TypeScript cubes | Visual models or raw SQL |
| Embedding | Native React | iFrame or SDK |
| Deployment | Part of your app | Separate service |
| Query Building | Programmatic + UI | Visual drag-drop |
| Runtime | Node.js | Java (JVM) |
Choose Metabase if:
- Your team prefers visual query building over code
- You want a standalone BI tool with user management built-in
- Non-technical users need to create their own reports
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want analytics as a native part of your React app
- Type-safe data modeling matters to your team
- You prefer not running a separate Java service
vs Redash
Section titled “vs Redash”Redash is an open-source tool for connecting to data sources, writing SQL queries, and creating visualizations. It focuses on SQL-first analytics.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Query Language | Semantic layer (JSON) | Raw SQL |
| Security Model | Built-in multi-tenant | User/group permissions |
| Embedding | Native React | iFrame |
| Target Users | Developers embedding analytics | Analysts writing SQL |
| Visualization | Recharts-based | Built-in library |
Choose Redash if:
- Your team writes SQL and wants direct database access
- You need a standalone analytics tool with scheduled queries
- Dashboard consumers just need to view pre-built reports
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want to embed analytics in your product for customers
- SQL injection protection and type safety are priorities
- Your users should query business concepts, not tables
vs Apache Superset
Section titled “vs Apache Superset”Apache Superset is an open-source data exploration and visualization platform under the Apache Foundation. It offers 40+ visualization types and a powerful SQL Lab for custom queries.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Apache Superset |
|---|---|---|
| Data Modeling | TypeScript cubes | SQL transforms, datasets |
| Embedding | Native React | iFrame |
| Deployment | Part of your app | Separate Python service |
| Visualizations | Recharts-based | 40+ built-in types |
| Target Users | Developers | Analysts, data teams |
Choose Superset if:
- You want a standalone BI tool with extensive visualization options
- Your team includes SQL power users who want SQL Lab
- You need a mature, Apache-backed project
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want analytics embedded in your product, not a separate tool
- TypeScript-first development is your preference
- Simpler deployment without Python/Flask infrastructure
vs Embeddable.com
Section titled “vs Embeddable.com”Embeddable is a developer toolkit for building customer-facing analytics. It provides React components (not iframes) and a drag-and-drop dashboard builder, powered by Cube.js on the backend.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Embeddable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open source | Commercial |
| Backend | Drizzle ORM | Cube.js |
| Components | Chart library | Pre-built dashboards |
| Dashboard Builder | Analysis Builder | Drag-drop no-code |
| Data Modeling | TypeScript | Cube.js YAML/JS |
Choose Embeddable if:
- You want a fully managed commercial solution
- No-code dashboard building is essential for your team
- Your team prefers Cube.js data modeling
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- Open source and self-hosting matter to you
- You already use Drizzle ORM for your app
- TypeScript-first development is your preference
vs Luzmo
Section titled “vs Luzmo”Luzmo (formerly Cumul.io) is an embedded analytics platform for SaaS companies. It offers a low-code dashboard builder and Flex SDK for custom implementations.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Luzmo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open source | Commercial SaaS |
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Cloud platform |
| Customization | Full code control | Low-code + SDK |
| Data Sources | Your database via Drizzle | Multiple connectors |
| White-labeling | Built-in theming | Enterprise feature |
Choose Luzmo if:
- You want a managed platform with minimal ops overhead
- Low-code dashboard creation suits your workflow
- Enterprise support and SLAs are requirements
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want to own your analytics infrastructure
- Cost control through open source is important
- Deep integration with your existing Drizzle schema is valuable
vs Cube.dev
Section titled “vs Cube.dev”Cube is an agentic analytics platform with a universal semantic layer. It uses YAML or JavaScript for data modeling and targets enterprise-scale deployments with built-in caching via Cube Store.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Cube.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Data Modeling | TypeScript + Drizzle ORM | YAML or JavaScript |
| Infrastructure | Runs in your app | Separate Cube Store service |
| Scale | Small to medium | Enterprise-scale |
| Pre-aggregations | Materialized views (manual) | Built-in Cube Store |
| API Compatibility | Cube.js API compatible | Native |
Choose Cube.dev if:
- You need enterprise-scale caching and pre-aggregations
- YAML-based data modeling fits your workflow
- Running a dedicated Cube Store is acceptable
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want analytics without additional infrastructure
- TypeScript and Drizzle ORM are already in your stack
- You can migrate to Cube.dev later when scale demands it
Note: Drizzle Cube maintains API compatibility with Cube.js, making migration straightforward when you outgrow it.
vs Mitzu.io
Section titled “vs Mitzu.io”Mitzu is warehouse-native product analytics that runs directly on your data warehouse. It specializes in funnel, retention, and cohort analysis without moving data.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | Mitzu |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Direct database queries | Warehouse-native |
| Focus | General analytics embedding | Product analytics |
| Analysis Types | Flexible cubes | Funnels, retention, cohorts |
| Data Movement | None (same database) | None (warehouse) |
| Target Users | Developers | Product and growth teams |
Choose Mitzu if:
- Product analytics (funnels, retention) is your primary use case
- You already have a data warehouse setup
- Self-service for non-technical teams is the goal
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You need embeddable analytics in your product
- Your data lives in an operational database
- General-purpose analytics beyond product metrics
vs Building Your Own with Recharts
Section titled “vs Building Your Own with Recharts”Recharts is a popular React charting library built on D3. You could build analytics yourself by writing SQL queries and rendering charts directly.
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Drizzle Cube | DIY with Recharts |
|---|---|---|
| Data Layer | Semantic layer included | Build your own |
| SQL Generation | Automatic, type-safe | Manual queries |
| Multi-tenancy | Built-in security context | Implement yourself |
| Time Handling | Granularity, period comparisons | Custom logic |
| Maintenance | Library updates | Everything is on you |
Build your own if:
- You need only a handful of static charts
- Full control over every SQL query matters
- You enjoy building data infrastructure from scratch
Choose Drizzle Cube if:
- You want to move fast with pre-built components
- Security and type safety should be automatic
- Business users might need self-service analytics later
Quick Decision Guide
Section titled “Quick Decision Guide”Just starting out? Begin with Drizzle Cube. Zero infrastructure overhead, type-safe queries, and you can migrate to Cube.dev if you outgrow it.
Need no-code dashboard building? Consider Metabase, Embeddable, or Luzmo depending on your budget and embedding needs.
Have a data warehouse already? Mitzu might be perfect for product analytics; Cube.dev for general semantic layer needs.
SQL-first team? Redash or Superset let analysts write raw SQL. Drizzle Cube adds a semantic layer for safer, reusable queries.
Budget-conscious? Drizzle Cube, Metabase (self-hosted), Redash, and Superset are all open source.
Enterprise requirements? Cube.dev and Luzmo offer commercial support and SLAs.
Next Steps
Section titled “Next Steps”Ready to get started with Drizzle Cube?
- Quick Start Guide - Embed your first dashboard in minutes
- How It Works - Understand the architecture
- Scaling Your SaaS - See how Drizzle Cube grows with you